mstakenidentity (
mstakenidentity) wrote2008-02-13 10:39 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
The Apology
I don't think there has been a moment since 9am in which I have not had tears in my eyes.
I am so indescribably happy that the government has done this.
I am proud.
I am so indescribably happy that the government has done this.
I am proud.
no subject
no subject
Do you have a lot of teenage mothers in your lineage?
no subject
This started 98 years ago. Was your mother a hundred when she had you?
no subject
Take your pick.
no subject
Judging by your other comments though you're just in this for the argument, but that's fine by me. As long as we're both enjoying ourselves. ^_^
no subject
'Infated' isn't a word, moron. I didn't realise that there was nobody alive who was older than fifty years.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-02-17 01:01 am (UTC)(link)fiftytwenty yearsthere, fixed that for you.
no subject
I'm sorry. I should have contextualised this. I was talking about civilised generations, which are about 50 years apart (usually known as the 'grandfather' unit). In your caravan park by the desert, I'm sure that there's only 20 years between you and your grandparents.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2008-02-17 07:46 am (UTC)(link)In this day and age the definition of generation may be somewhat greater than the traditional 20 year span, but it is certainly no higher than mid thirties, most defnine it now as 30-33 years.
Your use of a so-called grandfather unit does not, therefore, invalidate the claim made that the apology is generations overdue, as the poster did not say "generations in grandfather units" overdue. They were referring to the standard definition of generation which is between 20 and 35 years.
You are an odd person, mate. You get upset over typos, redefine words to suit your arguments and then resort to personal attacks because I don't want to log into livejournal on a public computer.
no subject
No. That was you back in this comment (http://mstakenidentity.livejournal.com/440593.html?thread=2596881#t2596881).
You are talking complete and utter nonsense. The definition I'm using is - amazingly enough - common to both biologists and anthropologists. You are talking garbage. This definition of 'generation' has been in use since the early 1900s. Go read a book.
You're even stranger in that you're getting responses from this post sent to your email address. Did arguing really mean that much to you?