Yup, this is what we do with our long weekends in this house...

[mstakenidentity]

As many of you know, Omniprop Productions will be performing Aristophanes Lysistrata at the Melbourne Fringe Festival later this year. It will be represented in the Fringe Guide by this image:



The question is, should we also use this image for the poster? So far we think yes if only because we can't be arsed doing that much work on it again. We though we should get some quick opinions from others, so I said I'd ask the internet.

Internet? Think this would make a good poster?

Comments

[mstakenidentity.livejournal.com]

Cool. Thank you. It is good to know how the image comes across to others.

I actually liked the lingerie because there is a bit of fuss made in the play about the women putting on their "see-through underwear". I'm a classics nerd- I like referencing the text in the image :-)

The way I hoped the shot would come across, is that women's bodies- and their sexuality- are a battlefield. In the play the women deliberately and overtly exploit their usually submissive sexual role and use it to invert their political and military roles. The woman is big, strong, alive; the men are small, impotent plastic figures- game pieces if you will.

And in the last scene of the play a naked women is brought on stage and the soldiers use her as a map of Greece to work out boundaries, which we were trying to reference, but if we had her naked it would limit where we could advertise our play (and frankly, as the model, I wouldn't do it).

I think for now we'll stick with this image, but sincerely, thank you for the feedback- I will keep thinking about it, and about other ways to get the same ideas across.

[whooz-queen.livejournal.com]

I know, its hard, and I can appreciate the work that you've put into it.

I guess that to me that the image is not 'big, strong, alive' woman. She (you) is lying down, faceless, soft, submissive, secondary to the action on the stomach. If you'd used a board and had the female's face scowling over it, I would call that more female dominant as an image. Or two women facing each other, side on, over a battlefield/chess board situation. Ideas, bum, pulling them out thereof. :)

[harkon.livejournal.com]

Actually the image looks fairly different if you rotate it clockwise. The only thing that makes it look a bit wrong is the position of the little men.

[fasangel.livejournal.com]

But that isn't the message of the play. The illusion of women being submissive and secondary, basically powerless is part of the subtext (or even full text) of the play, compared to the illusion of the powerful soldiers and their weapons controlling everything.