mstakenidentity: (Default)
[personal profile] mstakenidentity


Needed more:

-Rearing centaurs
-Empathetic Pevensies
-Reepicheep
-Dryads

Needed less

-Bits-that-weren't-in-the-bloody-book
-Brattiness
-Ents
-Susan/Caspian THERE IS NO SNOGGING IN NARNIA! JUST NO!

But it was okay.

Date: 2008-06-15 11:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greenpea33.livejournal.com
See I have now seen it and... my very strong feeling was that they broke the book. They broke it into itty bitty pieces, picked up 5 of them and made the rest of the story up.

They broke the notion of Narnia (no snogging, no people angsting about avenging Dad, no moody adolescents), they broke characterisations (Peter, Susan and Caspian most notably) and they put in an entirely silly, unnecessary action sequence (there's lots of action in the book they left out - why invent some?)

Plus a lot of the battles were just silly. No commander is going to open big tunnels into their fortress for a temporary advantage and archers don't indulge in hand to hand fighting like that. Or at least not for long. If you're going to break the book, you ought to be able to come up with something better than that.

In other words... I am not granting it an "okay" rating.

Profile

mstakenidentity: (Default)
mstakenidentity

April 2011

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 02:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios